Adrian Cortez and Melinda Cortez v. Martha Reyna Perez Appeal from 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NUMBER 13-24-00349-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ADRIAN CORTEZ AND MELINDA CORTEZ, Appellants, v. MARTHA REYNA PEREZ, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE 92ND DISTRICT COURT OF HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Tijerina and Peña Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras This matter is before the Court on appellants’ motion to dismiss. Appellants wish to withdraw or dismiss their appeal. Having considered appellants’ motion, we are of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Therefore, appellants’ motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed. Costs will be taxed against the appellants. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) (“Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.”). Because the appeal is dismissed at the appellants’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained. DORI CONTRERAS Chief Justice Delivered and filed on the 18th day of July, 2024. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
