Ethan Saenz v. Livesay Law Office Appeal from 370th District Court of Hidalgo County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NUMBER 13-24-00298-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ETHAN SAENZ, Appellant, v. LIVESAY LAW OFFICE, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE 370TH DISTRICT COURT OF HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Silva Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria On June 3, 2024, appellant filed a notice of appeal attempting to appeal a judgment or order entered in trial court cause number C-0590-24-G. On June 5, 2024, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that it appears there is no final, appealable order. Appellant was further notified that if the defect was not cured within ten days, the appeal would be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). On June 27, 2024, appellant was granted an extension of time to file a response by July 3, 2024. On July 5, 2024, appellant requested a second extension for time to file a response, which the Court granted until July 15, 2024. We have received no further filings from appellant, and the defective notice of appeal remains uncured. Appellant has not cured the defective notice of appeal, nor otherwise responded to the notices from the clerk requiring a response or other action within the time specified; accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c). Furthermore, appellant’s motion to extend the time to file a notice of appeal which was previously carried on June 27, 2024, is now denied as moot. NORA L. LONGORIA Justice Delivered and filed on the 28th day of August, 2024. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
